ISO 10012-1 PDFJune 16, 2020
ISO Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment – Part 1 : Metrological Confirmation System for Measuring Equipment. ISO/IEC General requirements for the competence of testing A: The two standards in question, ISO and ISO have. ISO INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO. First edition .. and replaces ISO and ISO , of which it.
|Published (Last):||5 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||10.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Skip to content Q: Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration. Even if the organization chooses to ieo to the requirements of ISOthe certification to ISO does not imply certification to the requirements of ISO ISO describes the requirements for a quality management system that can be accredited a process comparable but different from certification.
ISO – Wikipedia
It encompasses all aspects of the laboratory. Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress. There is a great deal of richness in the ISO family of documents and it is a shame for users to not know about and take 10102-1 of the full range 10102-1 possibilities. From the scope of ISO It also depends on the focus of your business. ISO defines requirements for entire quality management system that can be accredited.
In summary, ISO is a guidance document that addresses one element namely management of a measurement system of a quality management system. While the scope of both documents includes language that can perhaps cause confusion, what follows is the salient text from both that illuminates the difference between the two. I am updating the instrumentation section of a product fabrication specification to replace a cancelled military specification MIL-STD that specified calibration systems requirements.
Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration.
Difference Between ISO/IEC and ISO –
However if you are performing calibrations for other companies, and you are not accredited yet, I io recommend Z Root Cause Analysis Samples. Pricey, however that is the direction calibrations are going in the future. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Metrology ProgramQuality Progress. Denise Robitaille Vice Chair, U.
An organization, for example, could have a quality management systems that is certified to ISO General ixo for the competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesand I would like guidance on usage and application of these standards. It defines requirements relevant to the measurement management system in language that may illustrate interrelations to other parts of an overall quality management system.
ISO is a guidance document and not intended for certification.
Difference Between ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 10012
Correctly applied measurement, wherever and however it occurs, is an essential element of a successful business QMS. If you want to generate true confidence of measurement that your customers and AB appreciate, then of all of those standards, I recommend Z If calibrations are just a subsidiary aspect of your business, then spending the money to get accredited may not be necessary, especially if its for internal use only.
ISO focuses on the requirements of the measurement management system. It addresses such factors as contracts with customers, purchasing, internal auditing, and management review of the entire quality management system — ISO does not.
The competence referred to in the title of the standard relates to the competence of the entire system — not just training of personnel. You can consider it a system within the quality management system.