BEAMTIMES AND LIFETIMES PDFJune 22, 2020
Beamtimes and Lifetimes has ratings and 9 reviews. L.L. said: This is one of about 5 ethnographies that I recommend to my students when I want to get. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Sharon Traweek · Anne Kernan. University of California, Riverside. PDF. Particle physicists constitute a community of sophisticated mythmakers– explicators of the nature of matter who forever alter our views of space and time. But who.
|Published (Last):||14 March 2007|
|PDF File Size:||4.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The established physicists are afraid that they will not continue making significant contributions….
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Lifteimes to Book Page. Preview — Beamtimes and Lifetimes bwamtimes Sharon Traweek. Looks at the life of particle physicists, showing who these people are and lifegimes their world is really like. Traweek shows their similarities and differences, how their careers are shaped, how they interact with their colleagues and how their ideas about time and space shape their social structure.
Paperbackpages. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
To ask other readers questions about Beamtimes and Lifetimesplease sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Lists with This Book. Jul 16, L. Wynn rated it it was amazing Shelves: This is one of about 5 ethnographies that I recommend to my students when I want to get them thinking about how to write in a way that is accessible and engaging and not bogged down in jargon.
Aug 27, Charlotte rated it liked it.
Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists
If you’re a physicist, as I am, then reading this book is a bizarre experience. And, for the most part, it’s quite astute. The author pitches wildly a few times on the science, doesn’t understand physics education very well see, for example, her silly claim that undergraduate coursework gives only a simplified and partial version of major topics because “novices are thought to be unsuited to a full disclosure of truth in these first years”and says s If you’re a physicist, as I am, then reading this book is a bizarre experience.
The author pitches wildly a few times on the science, doesn’t understand physics education very well see, for example, her silly claim that undergraduate coursework gives only a simplified and partial version of lifrtimes topics because “novices are thought to be unsuited to a full disclosure of truth beamtmes these first years”and says some foolish things in the epilogue. Also, her claims about the gendered-ness of research apparatus is completely absurd.
Nevertheless, physics is not her field of specialty, so we have to cut her some slack. Really, though a layperson to the field, she has a solid grasp of a lot of physics and instrumentation.
I recommend this book to other physicists. For us, as physicists, to be more emotionally healthy people and to make the community more just and supportive of its members and capable of producing good science, it is valuable for us to have brought explicitly to our attention the mores and assumptions that we all share but rarely notice or acknowledge.
Beamtimes and Lifetimes
Among the topics to which I would particularly call attention is her analysis of anxiety within the community. She correctly observes that “Each stage [in a physicist’s training] has its characteristic anxiety: Graduate students are afraid of using up their predoctoral years working for a team whose experiments may prove unproductive; afraid of losing their chance at success by losing time.
Postdocs are beantimes two or three years ahead, trying to anticipate rewarding questions in physics; they become anxious about the future. Additionally, she makes a detailed analysis of gender which is–in bbeamtimes view, as a woman researcher–very liifetimes.
Aside from these social analyses, I found it thought-provoking to read about the state of research, research technology, and research funding in the mids. Jul 05, lilly rated it it was amazing. Super readable — skimmed it in a few hours in an evening — full of fascinating and engaging detail about what physicists wear and eat, how they consort, what they stress out and joke about, and what this has to tell us about their relationships to nature, gender, machines, and society more beamtmies. It isn’t, however, very heavy handed about the “why this matters” — it makes its points lightly a few times and mostly stays in the well-curated description so read it if you’re already curious, no Super readable — skimmed it in a few hours in an evening — full of fascinating and engaging detail about what physicists wear and eat, how they consort, what they liferimes out and joke about, and what this has to tell us about their relationships to nature, gender, machines, and society more broadly.
It isn’t, however, very heavy handed about the “why this matters” — it makes its points lightly a few times and mostly stays in ad well-curated description so read it if you’re already curious, not if you want convincing that cultures of science matter. Not as interesting as Ahd expected.
The book concentrated on the bureaucracy of particle physics quite a bit. It also seems rather dated, as my experience with particle physics is rather different. Mar 05, M rated it liked it. While a touch dated at this point, there is quite a lot to glean from the outsider’s anthropology of the mythologized realm abd the particle physicist lifetimees mythology which I’ve been brought up with, and which I do not fully reject, I must admit.
I would encourage anyone coming from the anti-postmodern camp to hold off on that impulse, though — just because a few pronouncements are a bit much doesn’t mean we should make a mockery of the whole thing. Those are not the pivotal insights of the book, anyway, in my opinion. I think it is baemtimes for those who are of a similar bent as me techno-optimist, pro-science, a bit defensive when it comes to the vitriol of cultural critics, and comfortable with a notion of progress to actually read works like this.
Many of the brash and hostile dismissals of this kind of work find a few silly sentences among dozens of revealing and enlightening ones and decide to toss the baby out with the bathwater.
I am finding that many of the dismissals of this kind of cultural anthropology either are misrepresenting what the sociologists are saying or, very possibly, they are able to see past the works and address the “true” motivations of the critics. That sounds a bit like a straw-man argument to me, though. And it’s not as radical, relativistic, or unhinged from reality as it is often presented. I think this book is a vast improvement upon the style used in the other famous work of science cultural anthropology, Laboratory Life, that I recently read.
This was readable and made its points clearly. This book does a great job lifteimes the social world and pressure of these scientists, and where culture Japanese and American, in this case intersects with practice. Its best points may be the ones it is not best known for, but it’s all there in the book.
Make up your own mind, but I bewmtimes this was worth reading. Dec 14, Zara Rahman rated it really liked it. I read this for a reading group at work, and in beamtines honesty it’s probably not the kind of book I would otherwise have picked up The main learning and the thing it is most cited for – is highlighting the importance of personal networks to professional achievements, which slightly sadly doesn’t surprise me wholly.
Jul 17, Daisy rated it it was amazing.
I loved the author’s humor. Feb 19, Edward Fenner rated it liked it Shelves: She interjected herself far too often for my liking.
Beamtimes and Lifetimes – Sharon Traweek – Google Books
Stated the obvious, too, a bit too often. LPenting rated it really liked it Aug 07, Natalie rated it it was amazing Nov 12, Ema Jones rated it liked it Feb 16, Emily rated it it was amazing Sep 10, Wim De Munter rated it did not like it Jun 04, Beth rated it really liked it Jun 27, Gabrielle rated it really liked it Jun 05, Katie rated it did not like it Mar 17, Reginald Pike rated lifftimes it was amazing Jan 01, Ellen rated it really liked it Dec 14, Dgunther rated it it was amazing Oct 18, Sara rated it really liked it Jan 20, Natalie Cohen rated it liked it Jun 30, Sarah rated it did not like it Dec 04, Priya rated it did not like it Liretimes 20, Allison Mickel rated it really liked it Feb 04, Leonore rated it it was amazing Nov 03, Charlie Wester rated it liked it Apr 16, Moggette rated it it was amazing Nov 27, Matthew rated it liked it Jan 21, Nicholas rated it it was ok Dec 14, Celia rated it it was beamtomes Aug 17, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Books by Sharon Traweek. Trivia About Beamtimes and Lif No aand or quizzes yet. Just lifteimes moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.